Labels:book | reckoner | sky | tree | windowpane OCR: 4 lawfulness under the Duc Process Clausc of delay between seizure propert and institution of judi cial forfeiture proceedings. 461 at 564 In do- ing so, however. the Court rejected the approach United States Thirty-seren Photographs, 402 U.S 363 (1971). In that case, the Court read time limits into different statutory provision ensure prompt disposition of objections the seizure 01 iegedly obscene materials, and therehy avoid substantial question concerning the constitutionality of the statutory scheme under the First Amendment. The Court reasoned ir $8850 that even "were inclined to interpret the statutes here in such way to avoid any due process question, would he im possible to read into the statutory scheme as we did ir Thirty-seven Photographs, thort statute 1 limi- tations, since 51 ...
(.png)
